At the core, leadership is about influencing people to achieve goals. This
is one of the best studied phenomena in the modern sciences of mind. No
need for jargon, ‘secret methods’, or ‘cutting edge’ mystique. If you want
to be a better leader, improve the culture of your team, or just learn how
people work, then we’ll help you make transparent, measurable change in
your dealings with others.
Leadership development, executive coaching, and culture transformation
programs are full of jargon and mystique. Gurus with secret formulas that
can help you or your team reach their full potential. But science doesn’t
have much in the way of secrets, and leadership and interpersonal dynamics
are some of the best studied. Let me show you.
This is a very simple pitch. I want you to do a favour for me. I want you to go
to whatever program on leadership, coaching, interpersonal dynamics, or culture
change you’re eyeing, and ask the question “how do you measure impact?” If
they have something more substantial to say than “measuring impact is hard”, a
bustle of optimistic phraseology, and a logo cloud, then you probably don’t
need to be here. If you, however, have not come away with a clear idea of how
they measure impact, then even if you decide Karstica is not for you, you’ll
benefit by reading on.
If this hasn’t already occurred to you, I hope you’ll take it from me: a
Cambridge-educated brain scientist with ten years of clinical experience, a
six year military career culminating as an Infantry platoon commander, and
several years dabbling in management consulting, most of these problems
have already been solved.
Modern sciences of mind are over 100-years old. Problems of personal
development, leadership, and the dynamics of collectives are a core concern
of this branch of science. These programs know this. This is why you’ll often
see them deploy quotes like those you’re seeing slide across the website now.
The military is arguably the oldest professional trade, and a main priority
is the development of it’s leaders. There’s no need to re-invent the wheel.
That’s just just true of content, but outcome too.
Hence Karstica. From karst, gorgeous natural landscapes characterised by
sinkholes, caves, and underground rivers, the idea here is to help you watch
where you walking. If you want to:
Make measurable progress: With a deep background in the behavioural sciences, and the sciences of mind, we can help you find the tools to measure your existing program, or, at a push, design a measurable program for you.
Audit the 'science': We would take great delight in evaluating the legitimacy of existing programs' theories and methodologies. There's nothing more satisfying for a scientist than falsifying a hypothesis.
Just collect a bunch of free tools: A core value of science is the democratisation of knowledge. If you don't have the means, or the appetite to pay for a consultation, we offer a collection of free tools and content that should work with or without our specialised guidance so long as you have the time to implement them.
No reason not to see what we can do for you, right?
Our time is far from free. But frankly we don’t do this full-time. We don’t
even want to. We only do this when the projects are interesting enough
to tear us away from our academic pursuits. So, we’re motivated to
provide tools that solve common problems without our intervention.
If all Karstica does is improve the landscape of leadership transformation
and culture change, then that’ll do. All we ask is that, if the free tools
we provide below fix your problems, send us a kind word of thanks.
The tools need a bit of tweaking. Get notified about new tools as they re-appear.
No drip campaigns. No vaguely relevant blog posts. You can find those below, or subscribe to our sister site btrmt. for that. This form is just for the tools.
Other content
Content on leadership, culture, and human systems change from our sister site,
btrmt.
You might have heard people often talk about the ‘reward neurotransmitter’
or the ‘love hormone’ or the ‘happiness molecule’ and so on. Fact is,
although we know about some actions of these neurotransmitters, we actually
have very little idea about how those actions play out in actual behaviour.
Today I want to tell a story. It’s one of my favourites. Certainly my favourite
‘when I was a consultant’ story. Hopefully, we’ll laugh a little, and then I’ll
use it to point out three ‘problems’ that often get in the way of us solving
<em>other</em> problems. I won’t really have a solution. I just think it’s amusing.
I’m often struck by just how much of the pop-psych/neuroscience advice one
sees for the average working person boils down to little more than “just
cool the fuck out, and you’ll be better at stuff”. I guess, more to the
point, I’m often left wondering why we feel the need to over-engineer this
kind of thing so egregiously, particularly when most of these theories seem
to produce as much bad advice as good advice. I have some thoughts, but let
me show you what I mean, and maybe we’ll work out what’s so attractive
about it along the way.